Uncategorized
The Framework Agreement has a transitional period from 1 January to 1 May 2020. We are working on a whole new type of agreement, including the development of new services and tools for research intelligence and workflow. It is a new territory for all the partners involved. We need more time to sort out the finer details. This agreement helps authors affiliated with member institutions of these organizations to publish their research in open access in Elsevier journals without having to pay an APC. The costs of publishing open access will be covered by the agreement. Yes. NWO believes that this agreement is in line with Plan S as it supports the following important points: The parties have been preparing the agreement since December, but the coronavirus health crisis has accelerated the process. Gino Ussi, Executive Vice President of Elsevier: “This MoU is an important step towards achieving Dutch research and open science ambitions and consolidating the Netherlands` position as an innovation leader in the international research community. This announcement has been in the works for a long time, which means that four research partners have taken their time and allowed themselves to explore the possibilities and limitations of this new and unique collaboration.
We look forward to formalizing the agreement with our trusted partners in the first months of 2020. NWO President Stan Gielen said: “This agreement is in line with Plan S and is a big step towards 100% open access and therefore a major breakthrough for open science in the Netherlands. The envisaged agreement encourages different approaches and innovations in data analysis by creating a level playing field that allows others to develop products based on Dutch scientific results. Elsevier is part of RELX, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision-making tools for professionals and business customers. www.elsevier.com Bayazit said the open access agreement will help the Netherlands “advance scientific and health outcomes through more open, replicable and collaborative systems of communication and scientific knowledge.” After missing the deadline by just a few weeks, a deal was unveiled in May. Remarkably, this happened before the working group could even present its guidelines. It is not clear why both sides wanted to conclude the negotiations, but it is clear that the treaty has clearly suffered from clarity. Both parties are united in marriage, but marriage contracts are long and vague.
At best, a reluctant “I do it.” If you look at the headlines of the national newspapers, you will get the impression that the Dutch are taking a big step forward on the path to open access and open science. But is this really the case? ScienceGuide interviewed experts and (co-)negotiators and questioned the fine print of the contract. It turns out that the parties have agreed on very specific definitions of open access and open science, with vague articles in the agreement to support them. Agreements that contradict previous statements about open science and rewards and recognition. .